![cunoFS is a Cheaper and Faster Alternative to FSx for Lustre](https://cuno.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/cunoFS-logo-vs.-FSx-for-Lustre-Logo-with-a-dollar-sign-background-300x300.png)
cunoFS is a Faster and Cheaper Alternative to FSx for Lustre
FSx for Lustre is a distributed parallel filesystem that’s used as part of HPC (high-performance computing) workloads across a variety of complex fields (including life sciences, machine learning, meteorology, finance, and media). It is AWS’s managed version of the Lustre filesystem, and while it’s a popular high-performance storage option, it can quickly become unaffordable as HPC projects scale. This article directly compares the cost and performance for FSx for Lustre and its alternatives, as well as discussing their scalability and compatibility with your existing HPC workloads. cunoFS is a high-performance alternative to Amazon’s FSx for Lustre filesystem This article compares FSx for Lustre, AWS Mountpoint, and cunoFS. cunoFS allows HPC users to use Amazon’s S3 object storage as a high-performance POSIX-compatible filesystem that outperforms FSx for Lustre on both cost and performance, as demonstrated in the benchmarks on this page. cunoFS allows you to run your existing applications and scripts (Python, C++, bash, etc.) as normal, which massively improves your development efficiency. Features and compatibility: comparing FSx for Lustre, AWS Mountpoint, and cunoFS FSx for Lustre vs. Mountpoint for Amazon S3 Mountpoint for Amazon S3 allows you to mount an Amazon S3 bucket as a local filesystem, but it has